taylor-ruth:

Once I said something to the effect of “he’s more impressed with himself when he calls you beautiful than he is with you” as some sort of statement towards the self-serving nature of compliments from men. This is especially true when you are not conventionally beautiful, in whatever way that means to you. The exchange then becomes “I can see beauty in you” carrying the implication that other men cannot, and you are supposed to thank him for completing such a strenuous task.

‘Salt, Fat, Acid, Heat’ Is a Marxist Fantasy Come to Life

antoine-roquentin:

In the new Netflix show Salt Fat Acid Heat —
based off the bestselling book by, and starring, chef Samin Nosrat — all
the food production is extremely inefficient. Whether it’s
traditionally brewed soy sauce in Japan (which ferments in the barrel for two years) or flavored honeys in Mexico (which are delicately extracted from a hive via tiny syringe),
Nosrat goes out of her way to tell us how little the producers can make
compared to industrial factories. (One Tixcacaltuyub bee hive yields
less than a liter of honey each year, compared to 30 to 40 kilos
annually for a more traditional hive.) Her point isn’t to communicate
the rarity of these ingredients in a Most Expensivest kind of way — there are few purchases and no prices on the show. The inefficiencies in SFAH are just a component of what makes the show so enjoyable: its vision of unalienated labor.

In one of what are called the 1844 Manuscripts, Karl Marx described
his theory of estranged labor: workers under capitalism encounter their
product as something “hostile and alien.” Value is sucked from the
worker’s body, through the commodity produced, into the owner’s pocket.
Unlike the sole proprietor (such as the proverbial ox-cart man),
the harder an employee works, the less they have. No wonder the
products seem hostile. Think about the difference in the way you’d feel
toward a hamburger you make for a drive-thru customer versus one you
prepare for yourself or with a loved one. One is depleting, the other
nourishing.

Reality food TV (distinct from the instructional cooking
show) tends to focus on the second kind of production, and for good
reason. We like dropping in on the roadside barbecue owned by the
pitmaster, the grandmother’s traditional kitchen, the seventh-generation
butcher, the buddies with a food truck. The back of the house at a
local Olive Garden franchise? Maybe on Undercover Boss, but workplace reality shows usually focus on conflict — think Bravo and Vanderpump Rules. Without alienation and the daily miseries of employment, those shows don’t work.

Alienation is not only a feeling of detachment from the
world, in Marxism it is a condition of literal theft. Workers exit the
day with less than they had when they entered — Americans know this
instinctively if not explicitly, which is why our national dream is to
“work for myself” before a company “uses me up.” A reality show about
the line cooks at a moderately expensive brunch place wouldn’t feel
anything like Nosrat’s slow-food explorations; there’s nothing calming
or even appetizing about the corner-cutting necessary to cook for someone else’s profit. When it comes to food, industrial efficiency is often gross.

Contrariwise, unalienated labor is sublime. This is
virtuosity performed for its own sake, and it’s the truth behind the
saying “the best things in life are free.” For example, hallowed above
all on fine-dining TV from Top Chef to Chef’s Table is
the concept of the “family meal” — the pre-service food that chefs cook
for their restaurant staff. Unlike the alienated dinners they’ll serve
later, family meal is a place for experimentation and risk. You can’t
buy your way in, it’s the workers’ privilege alone. Most creative
professions have their version of the family meal, and those of us who
work in those jobs are willing to trade a lot for the occasional
unalienated moment when we can give and/or receive work directly.

To paraphrase Ralph Waldo Emerson, something given is always better than something simply bought, and SFAH we
see how this is about more than feelings. In the “Acid” episode, when
we meet a group of women shaping tortillas by hand, they explain that
the alternative mechanical process pushes the oil from the cornmeal and
dries it out. Their product is better precisely because it’s
incompatible with mass production. It’s nice to imagine being part of
the circuits of unalienated exchange — which partly explains the
“artisanal” craze — and Nosrat enters on behalf of the viewer; the
difference between us and her being, of course, that she has her elite
cooking skills to offer.

Unalienated work isn’t just better for the majority of
humans involved, it’s much more ecologically sensitive. The beekeepers
from the “Acid” episode are in a caring relationship with the bees. They
show Nosrat the moat they’ve built around the hives to keep out
predator ants — no pesticides obviously — as well as the plants they’ve
installed on the small island to improve the “vibe.” A Japanese soy
sauce brewer in the “Salt” episode talks with the microbes, verbally
encouraging them. This is far from the instrumentalization of factory
farming, it’s genuine cross-species collaboration, with output limited
by the capacities of other living things rather than us limiting other
living things in rationally small pens and cages to extend our output
capacity.

SFAH doesn’t make an argument for local or slow
food per se, but that’s what we see. The dishes are simple, with few
ingredients, made traditionally and with pleasure. For a certain kind of
Marxist, this all reeks of conservatism or the hippie primitivism that some on the left call “folk politics.” Better to abolish our dependence on food
through technology and automation — then we can cook if and only if we
feel like it. Just as Shulamith Firestone wrote that artificial wombs
would free women from gendered oppression, so could Soylent free them
from the kitchen. There’s plenty in Marx to support this scientism, but
he’s got his ecologist moments, too. “All progress in capitalistic
agriculture is a progress in the art, not only of robbing the labourer,”
he writes in Capital Vol. I, “but of robbing the soil.”

Marx’s identification of the worker with the soil should
make us think critically about a left-wing perspective on food
production. What would it look like not to see the world as natural
“resources” to “exploit,” but as our external body? What would it mean
to reconcile our alienation from our labor and from the soil as well?
Netflix isn’t about to tackle those questions, but SFAH hints at the feelings (emotional, sensual) we might go looking for.

“They say the potter always drinks out of a broken pot,”
Nosrat’s mother tells her in the last episode, “Heat,” as they share
some rice that misses the serving plate. In what kind of world is the
food fallen on the counter the best bite? One that will belong to the
workers, someday.

‘Salt, Fat, Acid, Heat’ Is a Marxist Fantasy Come to Life

detectivebabineaux:

claryfightwood:

toogaytofunctionnn:

claryfightwood:

malviebertha:

claryfightwood:

Sharpay Evans was a lesbian

what do you mean “was”? she’s still a lesbian

wow you’re right, i guess i’m not used to lesbians being alive at the end of
a movie

Explain?? How??

  • weak ass crush on the most conventionally attractive boy in school despite having nothing in common with him.
  • obsession with the girl he was dating, thinking she hated her when really she was jealous of him.
  • theatre is gay
  • she loves drama
  • high femme
  • never ended up with a boyfriend because she was gay
  • best friends with her gay brother
  • only sings romantic duets with her gay brother because she’s also gay
  • determined to “stick to status quo” due to internalised homophobia
  • bop to the Top = she’s telling us she wants to be topped

You can tell OP had this list mentally prepared from the moment she hit “post”